July
25, 2010 Des Moines
TEXT: Luke 11:1-13
In one of
his more reflective moments, Huckleberry Finn reports,
“Miss
Watson she took me in the closet and prayed, but nothing come of it. She told me to pray every day, and whatever I
asked for I would get it. But it warn’t
so. I tried it. Once I got a fishline, but no hooks. It warn’t any good to me without hooks. I tried for the hooks three or four times,
but somehow I couldn’t make it work.
By and by, one day, I asked Miss Watson to try for me, but she said I
was a fool. She never told me why, and I
couldn’t make it out no way. I set down
one time back in the woods, and had a long think about it. I says to myself, if a body can get anything
they pray for, why don’t Deacon Winn get back the money he lost on pork? Why can’t the widow get back her silver
snuffbox that was stole? Why can’t Miss
Watson fat up? No, says I to myself,
there ain’t nothing in it.”
Huck,
it seems, was largely unconvinced by the notion of Jesus that “If you ask
anything in my name I will do it” (John 14:14), or “If you dwell in me and my
words in you, ask what you will and you will have it” (John 15:7), or the words
in this morning’s text, “everyone who asks receives, and everyone who searches
finds, and for everyone who knocks, the door will be opened.”
“No,” Huck
says to himself, “there ain’t nothing in it.”
But it sure is popular.
More
frequently than any other gospel writer, Luke portrays Jesus at prayer. And it’s not only Jesus. Zechariah, Anna, Peter, Paul, Cornelius, and
the whole church pray regularly and fervently as reported in Acts, Luke’s other
book.
But
stepping back and gathering a larger view, the Bible as a whole continually
“pushes” prayer. A lot of “how-to’s” are
given, such as “In private”, “without lofty phrases”, “spontaneously as
children”, “fervently as saints.” But
quite often, even with all this help, we, like the disciples in the story, stand
frustrated watching from the sidelines saying, “teach us to pray.”
We have to
admit at the outset that many of our petitions are not answered. We could, and perhaps should define “answer”
in broad enough terms to be able to say all prayer is answered, but if we mean,
as most of us do, “answered according to the hopes and terms of the asking”
(Buttrick, 79-80), most go unanswered.
Just ask Huckleberry Finn. And
while most of us haven’t prayed for fish hooks in quite a long while, we have
prayed for healing for those who continued to suffer and deteriorate; prayed
for courage, still to find a lump in our throat; prayed for a safe journey,
still to have an accident; prayed for a happy marriage, still to be
divorced. And you know, as I do, that it
has nothing to do with the intensity or sincerity of the appeal.
And yet,
even while we list those frustrations, we know of those healed; safe journeys,
marriages full of joy, and bold courage -- all attributed to prayer. “Lord, teach us to pray!”
Notice the
context of the question: “Teach us to
pray as John taught his disciples.” The
context is comparison – we look around and see so many doing it so well. Others seem to have such a good handle on
prayer; they get what they want; they do it enthusiastically, and they urge
others to do it as well.
And
yet… While we often enjoy a good and
meaningful period of devotion, when prayer flows as naturally as a stream down
a mountain path; and while prayer seems like the most important act at the side
of a sick bed or on the doormat of a major life decision, there are those times
of doubt and frustration when, in the words of one beloved woman, “I wonder if
they ever get passed the ceiling.”
Jesus --
very briefly according to Luke -- offers an example of a prayer, then moves directly on to something perhaps
even more central than the content or the mechanics; at least it is more
basic: what’s the use? Why should you pray? Why is prayer not simply an exercise in
psychological catharsis or cosmic shopping?
“Suppose
one of you has a friend…” he begins, and you smell a story in the air.
“Suppose
one of you has a friend who comes to him in the middle of the night and says,
‘my friend, lend me three loaves, for a friend of mine on a journey has turned
up at my house, and I have nothing to offer him’; and he replies from inside,
‘Do not bother me. The door is shut for
the night; my children and I have gone to bed; and I cannot get up and give you
what you want.’”
“I tell you
that even if he will not provide for him out of friendship,” Jesus continues,
“the very shamelessness of the request will make him get up and give him all he
needs.”
What is
this “shamelessness” that appears to be so pivotal? It has been translated a variety of
ways: importunity, persistence,
insistence. But shamelessness comes
closest to the idea – which is to say “a lack of concern for how it makes you
look”. The feeling is not so much persistence – tenacity – as it is
single-mindedness that finds everything else – including good manners --
irrelevant. Even if the sleeping
neighbor will not get up out of friendship, he will get up, simply to get the
guy off his back. It’s like the phone
that rings and rings in the dead of night.
You finally answer it, not because the ring has convinced you it is
important, but because you can no longer tolerate the disturbance. You get up to relieve the irritation.
“And so,”
Jesus continues, “Ask, and you will receive; seek, and you will find; knock and
the door will be opened.” If persistence achieves results from a neighbor in a
bad mood, how much more can one expect to receive responsiveness from a perfect
parent.
“If you,
then, bad as you are, know how to give your children what is good for them,”
Jesus concludes the final story of the text,” how much more will God give the
Holy Spirit to those who ask!”
It’s
interesting to me that what is received, according to Luke’s version, is not
fish hooks, return of stolen snuff boxes, or lost money; not even healing or
courage or insight, but rather “the Holy Spirit”. It has been said that the Holy Spirit is the
one gift that God cannot give without being asked. A father can give his children things
whether they ask for them or not, but he cannot give himself
– his love – except to those who want to receive it.
I don’t
know. The passage says little about how
God fills requests or about what to do when prayers go unanswered. We’ll have to go elsewhere for that. This story simply invites us to do it,
storming heaven as it were, shamelessly, and with confidence that God will
hear, listen, and respond.
Once upon a
time, heavy rain turned a placid stream into a raging torrent. Factories were flooded, and homes were swept
off their foundations. Storefronts were
shattered, and apartment buildings were reduced to kindling. A school and social hall floated away, never
to be seen again. Even the small, white
church on the east bank of the river was not spared. Ice, trees, and other debris pounded it for
three days. The members responded by
working long hours to fill enough sandbags to protect their meetinghouse.
The cold
was raw and biting. There seemed to be
no end to the icy water. At one point
the water came toward the church with such force that part of the dike was
washed away. All of the workers except
one dropped their shovels and ran to high ground. The laborer who stayed behind knew that all
would be lost if the dike was not rebuilt.
He climbed to the top of the barricade, reached into the rushing water,
and grasped the roots of a huge tree. He
took out his pocketknife, cut two roots from the tree, and tied them together
in the shape of a cross. His act of
faith rallied the workers, and the roots became a symbol of hope.
The laborer
hung the cross on the wall of the church above the place where he and his
neighbors toiled. The area beneath the cross
became a place of prayer. Men and women
joined hands and prayed for God to help them renew their strength. They also asked God to help them grow in
faith and love for each other as a result of facing this trial together.
The church
members continued to battle the flood for the next two days, and the
meetinghouse was saved. And yet, at
least for the one who reported the story, that victory was incidental in
comparison to what happened to the people.
They learned to serve each other and care for one another. They also learned what it is like to walk
into the midst of tragedy and suffering with God at one’s side.
So, what
happened there? Exactly what, as a
result of those prayers – all that “storming of heaven” – did God do, in that
flood or in ours? I don’t really know –
except to observe that, by all counts, the Holy Spirit was there, present, just
as Jesus had promised.
Way better than fishhooks! So, shamelessly, and confidently, with open
and receptive hearts, we pray.