July 4, 2010 Des Moines

Sermon Text:  Luke 10:1-11, 16-20

 

A Revolutionary Assumption

In France the “4th of July” is July 14 – otherwise known as Bastille Day  – the day when French peasants, fed up with the disregard shown them by King Louis 16th and his wife Marie Antoinette, stormed the famous Bastille prison in 1789 and liberated the prisoners, confiscated the weapons, and set in motion the French Revolution. 

In Poland the “4th of July” is November 11 – except during those years when it was celebrated on July 22, before being moved back to November 11 – commemorating the anniversary of Poland's assumption of independent statehood in 1918 after 123 years of partitions by Austria-Hungary, Germany, and Russia.

In Texas I happen to know that the “4th of July” is March 6, commemorating the day in 1836 when over two hundred besieged defenders died at the hands of the Mexican Army while fighting for Texas independence at the Alamo.

The Mexicans, of course, knew a little something about that process themselves, having declared their independence from Spain in 1810, a move that took another 11 years to accomplish.  Then, of course, there is August 1 in Switzerland, August 15 in India, September 15 in Nicaragua, and April 18 in Zimbabwe. The Burundians upstairs might have been celebrating earlier this week on July 1, in the same way that we are today celebrating July 4 – which is just to say that everybody seems to celebrate “Independence” from one oppressor or another. 

Each of those moves has its own colorful story – some such revolutions, as is often said of Czechoslovakia's, are covered in velvet; others, such as the one with which we are more familiar that pitted the Red Coats against a determined army of American colonists bent on liberty and self-rule, are covered in blood. 

Still others are simply drenched in laughter.  When my parents were sorting through decades of accumulation in preparation of moving out of the house where they had reared two sons, accomplished a career and meaningfully lived for over 40 years, my mother came across a handwritten sheet of notebook paper on which a younger version of me had spelled out the terms of it titled at the top of the page my “Declaration of Independence.”  Chief among those terms were not such things as “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness;”  merely the abandonment of piano lessons. 

Which is just to acknowledge that not all revolutions are military.  In addition to those fairly routine adolescent ones, we have seen an industrial revolution that changed the way we manufacture goods.  We have lived through a sexual revolution that changed that way we talk about and practice that most intimate part of ourselves.  And we have participated in an informational revolution that, with the advent of the personal computer and the refinement of the internet, has changed the way we process data, gather information, listen to and acquire music, and communicate with each other. 

Revolution, after all, simply refers to a fundamental change that replaces an old way of being or thinking or acting with a new one because of widespread dissatisfaction with the existing one.  That dissatisfaction might be centered around perceived parental limitations, or poverty and injustice under cruel, corrupt, or incapable rulers.  It may have to do with new ideas or new discoveries or previously unrealized opportunities.  Wherever it occurs, however, a revolution needs strong leaders who can use unsatisfactory conditions to unite people under a program that promises something better.

  John Kenneth Galbraith once observed that “All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door.”  And so it was that Jesus came, stirring a revolution by kicking in the rotten doors of a spirituality and a way of community that could not support life.  It would be neither a quick nor an easy victory.  What had begun with his own witness and ministry, he expanded to the ministry of an intimate circle of disciples.  In the passage before us, that revolutionary mission is expanded even further.  Seventy – in some ancient manuscripts the number is seventy-two – are sent out to extend the vision of God’s shalom – God’s ultimate brand of peace.

The opportunities, Jesus told them, are plentiful.  There simply aren’t enough people seizing those opportunities.  There will be challenges, he acknowledged, but you will be equipped.  Travel light, he counseled; keep focused, and work in pairs.  Why pairs?  For one reason, according to Mosaic law, two witnesses were required for a testimony to be credible.  In addition, given the rigors of travel in those days it simply made good sense. 

Then Jesus gave three more instructions.  When you enter a town,

·        Eat what is given you without prejudice or snobbery;

·        Heal the sick;

·        Extend your gift of peace;

·        And when you leave, whether or not you have been accepted, let people know that in your presence the Kingdom of God has drawn near to them.

In some ways it is a straight forward story – a slice of life from the ministry of Jesus.  But given a little closer scrutiny, I see at least two principles at work in the story that sound quite revolutionary. 

The first comes in the form of Jesus’ authorization of the many rather than the few.  In our culture we have gotten quite accustomed to viewing ministry as the proprietary work of the clergy and those specially trained for particular work.  We credentialed ones are the only ones who can pray before meals or visit the hospital.  Oh, sure, you riff-raff can go to the hospital to visit a family member or a friend, but it doesn’t really count – doesn’t really qualify as “ministry” unless the Minister does it.  Why, after all, do you think they call us “ministers”?  We are the ones who do ministry.

I hope you can tell from my voice how deeply my tongue is embedded in my cheek.   The characterization I just described is at least false, if not ultimately sinful.  Jesus understood that gifts for ministry are the beans and rice of life, not the caviar reserved for the elite few.  Sure, there are particular things for people like me to do, but there are infinitely more dimensions of ministry for us to practice and embody and accomplish together.  We are called to ministry, not just me.   In this era of narrower and narrower specialization, the thought of such a thing is revolutionary, indeed.

The second revolution comes in the form of a minister’s presumptive greeting.  “Whatever house you enter,” Jesus instructs the fledgling disciples, “first say, ‘Peace to this house!’” 

Not, “friend or foe?” or “is this a ‘red’ house or a ‘blue?’” or “do you agree with my stand on reproductive rights, marriage equality, government interference in business and whether or not bike lanes should be striped into popular thoroughfares?”  No, just “peace to this house.”  That type of greeting betrays a very different set of operative assumptions about who is inside and how it will be that we engage one another. 

Just to drill that down a little, it will mean that we will assume about one another from the outset that we are not enemies; that we are not a meeting of superior and inferior, goodness and evil, potential threat.  I know, I know:  these are dangerous times and we need to keep our wits about us.  I understand how sensible it can sound for someone to argue that we need to just assume – whether we are individuals or a nation – that there are spiders under every rock, thieves behind every bush, and terrorists in every passenger seat. 

I just want you to hear for a moment how different that sounds from the way Jesus instructs his disciples to proceed:  “Whatever house you enter, first say, ‘Peace to this house!’”  It is true that not every house you enter will live up to that invocation.  But you will notice that even when the peace is not received, Jesus instructs his disciples to stay there, eating and drinking and bearing witness. 

I have to say that this determination to break away from pre-judgment and condemnation sounds far more revolutionary than breaking away from England.  So what would it look like if each of us took this commission seriously?  What would it look like for each of us to involve ourselves personally in Christ’s revolution of peace? 

According to the instructions given to the seventy, it would involve the many of us extending some large measure of relational hospitality – sitting down with others, on their terms, listening to their stories and receiving what they have to give at the same time we are sharing what is ours.  It would involve a new measure of gracious acceptance that sets aside the cultural and philosophical boundaries that typically divide us, and share in acts of community. 

And it would mean choosing to live instead of merely trying to keep from dying.

Life moves so fast these days, and the world can seem like such a scary place.  We hunker down and barricade ourselves in, take our vitamins and drink skim milk, and generally keep such a close watch on our feet to keep from stumbling or stepping in something untoward that we neglect to watch where we are going.  But being careful and staying safe were never much use in revolutions, and make no mistake:  Jesus calls us to be instruments in a “revolution of peace”.

There is a subtle postscript included in the story of the disciples’ return.  Joy characterizes the experience of the disciples who have obeyed Jesus’ mission charge.  We often view discipleship as onerous, difficult, and self-depriving.  These disciples in the story would simply look back at us who hold such a view with a look of utter confusion.  What they found in faithfulness was joy.  Sure, it was difficult.  Yes, there was disappointment.  No, not everybody joined in and sang along.  But in the midst of it all was joy. 

In a world so preoccupied with and defensive about individual “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” wouldn’t it be nice to be filled, instead, with joy?

Wherever you go – at whatever door you knock – before you do anything else, first say, ‘Peace to this house,’” knowing that when you do, the kingdom of God has come near.