“The Colors Through Which we Look at
Life”
Fourth in a Series on the Sanctuary
Stained Glass Windows
March 14, 2010 Des Moines
Genesis 8:6-12
“The Dove &
Olive Branch”
“Reboot.” That one simple exercise has become the
primary tool in my computer workbench. If
you have any experience with computers at all you already know that “rebooting”
is just a fancy word for turning it off and turning it back on again. I don't really understand what that
accomplishes; I only know that every now and then it is as though the
computer's brain gets rattled -- it suddenly loses its way and gets
paralyzed. Programs won't open
correctly; windows won't move around like they are supposed to; everything just
gets stuck. And the only solution seems
to be this absolutely simple one: “reboot.”
Shut it down. Turn it back on.
Which
is rather like what God did with the flood:
having breathed creation into life, installed all kinds of people and
programs on it, and operated it for some generations, it all seemed to freeze
up, like Microsoft at its worst, into a discombobulated, dysfunctional
mess. And so God shut it down, and then
turned it back on. There are no doubt
more sophisticated ways of talking about the flood, but I think that's the gist
of it. After trying this and trying
that, there seemed to be nothing left for God to do but “reboot.”
But
as horrific as it has always sounded to me, this is not finally a story about
vindictive destruction, but rather one about grace; about redemption; about
God’s determination to love.
There
is something picturesque about this gentle account of the dove. After all this time sequestered in the Ark,
Noah first sends out a raven to see if the waters had receded. It was an old mariner's trick, and when the
raven shortly returned it told the Captain what he needed to know: hang tight.
He later sent out a dove – once, then again, and still again. That final time the dove didn’t return,
signaling to Noah that the coast was clear.
But it is that second flight – when the dove returned with an olive
branch – that has stuck in our imaginations ever since as a moving sign of
reconciliation; of, to put it another way, “peace.”
And indeed it was precisely
that. By closing up the rain clouds and
draining off the floods, God was once again bringing order out of chaos. Here, with a twiggy sign of new life, God was
making peace. “We will start this
relationship over,” was the implied divine word. And so it happened.
I
don't know if you have carefully read the rest of the story, but as it turned
out the only thing changed by the flood was God. Humankind proved itself to be just as corruptible
after the flood as before. Saintly old Noah had hardly stepped foot off
the boat when he promptly got himself drunk and started playing Peter Rabbit,
hopping into one bedroom after another.
And it all started slipping downhill from there.
But
if the reboot hadn't had the desired effect on creation, it turned out to be a clarifying experience for
God. “I am not going to do that
again,” God resolved, and determined to spend the rest of time seeking no
longer to replace or recreate but to heal what was broken.
That,
it seems to me, is the message of the dove with the olive branch in its beak
captured in glass in the window on the south side of this room: this holy commitment and determination to
step over the brokenness between us and heal this land, and to call that
healing “peace.”
Other
endeavors have borrowed that word, to be sure.
When the Roman Empire began to extend its reach around the world as they
knew it, they called their influence the Pax Romana – the “peace of Rome.” But what they
had in mind – as have empires ever since – was public order and quiet; and how
they proposed to create and maintain that “peace” was through victory and
submission.
People of faith have always
understood peace to describe a very different end, achieved through very different
means. Olive branches, for example,
rather than swords.
Once
upon a time, Jesus told a story about a certain family. It’s a family that could live in any of our
neighborhoods. The particulars could
vary from house to house, but in this specific family there was a father – a
single parent apparently -- doing his best to raise two boys.
Chances
are you know the general outline of the story – the younger of the sons asks
for and receives his share of the inheritance and leaves home. But it goes badly for him out in the cold,
cruel world, and he returns home humbled and chastened, willingly foregoing his
family status to work as one of the servants.
Meanwhile, all the time the
younger brother has been doing everything wrong,
the older brother has been doing everything right – straight “A's”, always home by curfew; belting his
trousers up around his waist instead of sagging them below his hips; “yes,
sir”, “please,” and “thank-you.” So when
Dad throws a party to celebrate the renegade's return, the “good” son pops his
top instead of a cork.
“It
just isn't right,” he whines. “Shouldn’t
there be some kind of hell for him to pay?
He shouldn't just get to come back and everything be all
hunky-dory. And wait a minute; he isn't
getting any more of the inheritance!
Everything left is mine!”
Inheritance. Doesn't it often boil down to that? How many families have blown apart over which
sibling was going to get this painting or that piece of furniture or this set
of dishes or the washing machine – or the table saw, to say nothing of the
money. Or the land. Or the jewelry. Or the silver. Sometimes, I suppose, the conflict is over
memories and sentimentalities, but oftentimes the issue is simple greed –
putting stuff ahead of people.
That's
particularly dramatic in Jesus' story of this family. Have you ever wondered, with me, why the
younger son confessed, upon returning home, that he had “sinned against”
his father? The answer, in part, turns
out to be that in asking for his inheritance, he was implicitly jumping over
his father's life; effectively counting his father as already dead. As if to say, “I’m more interested in the
money than you.”
And isn't that at least some
part of the older brother's disapproval of the party thrown for his errant
brother's return – that part of what he was supposed to get was being blown on
this misguided and misplaced celebration?
Meanwhile,
the father – who certainly could have stood steadfast on his principles; who understandably
might have exacted an “ounce of flesh,” or demanded groveling while dishing out
humiliation – simply placed an olive branch in his hands, overjoyed at his
son's return; as though – and here is the really unnerving part – people were
more important than anything else.
Is it
too simplistic to suggest that the world is the way it is because of our
persistent determination to act like one or the other of these sons instead of
the father, who, after all, seems to be the point of the story? Is this the kind of world we get when we
elevate possessions and principles over people?
Little
wonder that scripture is so interested in repentance – a word which doesn't really
mean feeling sorry about something, or resolving to “clean up the way I'm
living,” but rather means “changing directions.” To repent
simply means to choose a different path that leads in a different
direction.
Let’s face it: it doesn't really take a rocket scientist to
recognize that the “way we are going” – the direction we are headed – isn't
likely to get us where we want to go. Which
brings me back to the notion of peace.
If empires argue that there will be peace on earth when all is quiet and
orderly, Jesus counters that there will be peace on earth when all have what
they need to flourish. If empires argue
that the path to peace is power and victory, Jesus counters that peace will
only come when we begin to see ourselves as God already does: as not only uniquely precious, but collectively
so; one and whole, and in each other's keeping and care.
When we repent, in other words; when we choose to
take a different path; when we begin to carry olive branches, and welcome one
another home. Then it will be that we,
too, feel the flutter of the wings of a dove, and God will heal our
land.