February 22, 2009 Des Moines

Ephesians 4:1-7, 15-16

  

Using Well the Tools – Stewardship of all God’s Gifts

 

We take inventory every now and then, and vow to somehow do better.  But as the annual Rummage Sale at the church routinely shows, no matter how much we clear out and give away, it’s like withdrawing your finger from the ocean:  it never leaves a hole. 

Years ago, the irreverent and now-late comedian George Carlin riffed on our propensity for accumulating “stuff.”  “All you need in life,” he observed, “is a little place for your stuff.  That’s all your house is:  a place to keep your stuff.  A house is just a pile of stuff with a cover on it.  And when you leave your house, you gotta lock it up.  You wouldn’t want somebody to come by and take some of your stuff.  They always take the good stuff.  That’s all your house is:  a place to keep your stuff while you go out and get more stuff.  Sometimes you gotta move – got to get a bigger house.  Why?  No room for your stuff.” [1]

Stuff:  gathered and hoarded and hovered protectively over.  There is, most of us have to confess, something truthful about that rather nondescript characterization of our accumulations.  “Stuff.”  But we do have other examples. 

There was, I vividly recall, always a sort of comic awkwardness to graciousness in my grandparents’ Berclair home.  You know how it is as a grandchild:  you grow up around certain knick-knacks and decorative elements that, over time, become more “artifact” than “decoration” – this vase or that frame or this chair or that candy dish.   As I grew into young adulthood and old enough to notice the familiar features around their house, there developed what was at least a fondness for them if not outright reverence – quite irrespective of any real monetary value.  Sometimes I would even express that fondness out loud. 

Invariably my grandmother would respond, not with a “thank you” or “that was given to us by…” or “we bought that when…” but rather “I’ve promised that to “so-and-so” – an aunt or a cousin or a friend.  And sure enough, if you were to look on the back of, or on the bottom of, virtually anything around the house you were likely to find a piece of masking tape on which had been written a name.

I use to think my grandmother’s “distributive anticipation” was rather morbid – like she was constantly preparing for a near end to her days and she was getting her affairs in order.  I didn’t know anybody who seemed quite so conscious of their own mortality as she seemed to be, and the awkwardness notwithstanding of trying to find a way, then, to clarify that I wasn’t really trying to hint my way into her estate planning, the whole “death thing” made me rather uncomfortable.  She seemed to me old enough to have already lived forever, so I didn’t really see any point in worrying that that would ever – at least in my lifetime – change.  Why, then, make all these plans for household distribution?

What I finally figured out much later – and unfortunately long after my grandparents’ things were, indeed, distributed for those very reasons – was that they weren’t preoccupied with death, as I had presumed; they simply weren’t preoccupied with possessions, either.  They had them, yes, and used them, sure – and certainly enjoyed them – but weren’t possessed by them.  More like “trustees,” my grandparents were merely the current stewards of things that no one finally “owns.”

My grandfather’s application of that principle showed itself in the form of land.  Somewhere along the way – and partly for family reasons and partly for investment reasons – he had begun to accumulate land.  A field here, a parcel there, a waterway, grazing pasture, hunting acres and every now and then a crop.  He had it all as far back as I can remember – the Bee County farm, the Hartman Place, the May Property, Loma Alta.  And it was those designations that always mystified me.  “May” I recognized as my grandmother’s maiden name, but who was “Hartman” and why was Grandad’s land still known by his name?  “When,” I always wondered, “does it ever become “the Diebel Place”? 

Well, never as far as my granddad was concerned.  Land, he seemed instinctively to understand, was something that stretches out on all sides of us – before us and after us.  We may hold title to it for a time, but we are only taking care of it for a season.

Bill and Patti Sutherland seem to “get” all of this as well.  Having indulged for years a love of Italy, and after traveling there whenever they could, and ultimately ready for a change from their successful commercial real estate business in Texas, they sold the company, their home and most of what was in it and moved to the small, medieval Tuscan village of Montefollonico where they had found an acreage and a house they could purchase and renovate as their own.  The stone house, built 500-700 years ago, sits just a mile or so outside the walled community, on a hill, nested in a grove of olive trees and grape vines planted long before they arrived.  There they live each moment with the magnitude of time and their small part in it. 

“We don’t own this place in any real sense of the word,” Bill told me as we walked around the barn.  “Sure, we bought the title to it, as far as that goes, but all we are really doing is borrowing it for awhile and taking care of it as best we can.”  

They are “stewards” of it, in other words, for however long they are privileged to share its beauty and its history and responsibility for its well-being.

My mother’s parents, in a very different place and in very different ways took those principles to an even more active application:  more than care-taking, for them stewardship was partnership.  They did their best to reduce what is now called their “carbon footprint” long before Al Gore was born, let alone popularized the phrase.  They composted kitchen scraps long before I had ever heard the word, and carefully tended the fruit and nut trees they had planted behind the house that my grandmother’s father had built for them by hand. 

Those trees, to their way of thinking, were living beings that warranted no less attention and tender loving care than they, themselves, did.  Indeed, they saw those trees and their own lives as deeply inter-dependent and co-existent:  a kind of complementarity that benefited not only themselves and the trees, but also those with whom they shared the harvest, and now a subsequent generation who live there and enjoy the harvest precisely because of their careful tending.

Stewards:  caretakers, so to speak, of that which no one can finally “own,” and co-workers in the growth and well-being of the whole.  It is an ancient way of viewing the world around us and all that it contains; a sense that we are part of and partners in something larger than ourselves.  We have a role to play, to be sure, and our own narration to contribute, but it isn’t finally our story.  Different cultures have had different ways of talking about it, but children of Abraham and followers of Jesus pretty quickly get around to talking about God, and the sense of profound abundance. 

“Christian stewardship,” writes one theologian, “is about the activity of God who showers us with gifts and invites us into a covenantal responsibility for the benefit of all of creation.  A stewarding community is a community of overwhelming gratitude and overflowing generosity.”[2]

Over and over the New Testament calls attention to the gifts that are full within us and all around us, and that our role is to take good care of them and make good use of them; that the ultimate purpose of them is to glorify the God who put us in charge of them and to build up the community in need of them.  They are not ours to possess, but are ours to prosper and contribute. 

That perspective of wealth takes some strength and steadiness in a season like the one weighing down on us just now, so taut with the chill of apparent scarcity.  Scarcity drives people to lock up and shut out and hold tight – instincts quite in conflict with God’s assurance of abundance.  We become afraid and selfish and competitive and protective in ways that finally shatter the community we are partnering with God to build, and sucks the joy from our souls.  But both the testaments that inform our spirits assume a “world of plenty, where, when God's gracious righteousness reigns, there is more than enough for everyone.”[3]

            As a people with roots in Eden who were guided to a land of milk and honey and plentifully fed with a couple of loaves and a few fish, scripture nudges us toward tithing – even in the leaner years; toward sharing and generous compassion grounded in God’s assurance of adequacy.  But our culture – even when the global economy is humming merrily along – encourages us to believe that enough is never enough; that there is always more “stuff” to want and covet and finally add to our “pile of other stuff with a cover over it.” 

The gifts of God, however, were never meant to pile.  Like horns and drums and keyboards and strings, those gifts were given for music – offered up and woven into harmonies with others generously shared.  And God knows we could use a little more music in our lives these days.  Using well the gifts we’ve been given – accepting the ministry of stewardship – begins, then, with the recognition that we have them; and that once taken out from under cover and faithfully used, the whole community can sing.

 



[1] “A Place for My Stuff”, from the album A Place for My Stuff (Atlantic Records, 1981).

[2] Paul Dietterich, Executive Director Emeritus of the Center for Parish Development

[3] Ibid