September 30, 2007 Des Moines

4th in a series on Faith in Public Life

Proverbs 29:18

 

“Molding the Powers”

If you have ever heard of the Irish politician and philosopher Edmund Burke who died over 200 years ago, it is probably because of the single quotation attributed to him, and quoted over and over again.  All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” 

            It is a compelling wisdom that we do well to keep alive in our storehouse of common sense.  But over-quoting is not the same thing as overusing.  Unfortunately, plenty of good people do, in fact, move through their days saying and doing nothing to stanch the seeping ripples of evil.  We would certainly like to be counted among those who throw themselves as barricades into the oncoming path of evil, but let’s face it:  that’s easier desired than done. 

It’s easy, for starters, to get intimidated by the deafening cacophony of voices already loud and aggressive.  Some of us are just trying to keep from getting run over.  For others, the problem is timidity.  Some of us are shyly uncomfortable doing anything that calls attention to ourselves, while others of us are paralyzed by humility – “I certainly don’t want evil to triumph, but I’m just little ol’ ‘aw, shucks’ me.  Who is going to listen to anything I have to say?”  For others, it is our very “niceness” that gets in the way – not wishing to come across as impolite or untoward.  And many of us simply don’t like to rock the boat. 

            For others, however, the problem is that pesky little dilemma of ambiguity.  What, after all, is good, and what, when it comes down to it, is evil?  An article this week in the Wall Street Journal focused on the confusion within the Southern Baptist Church over the environment in general, and global warming in particular.  One advocate interviewed argues that ignoring the perils facing God’s creation is nothing short of sinful and theologically irresponsible.  Another, a local church pastor, retorts that anything that distracts or diverts attention from preaching salvation in Jesus Christ represents the devil’s next creative strategy. 

Is it even possible, in other words, to agree on what the voice of “good people” is saying, and what represents the triumph of evil?  How can we say anything with conviction on behalf of the “good” if we don’t know exactly what it is?  And indeed, haven’t some of the scariest demagogues throughout history been those who were absolutely sure they had it all defined?  We might agree with folk singer Susan Werner who prays on her recent CD The Gospel Truth, “deliver us from those who think they’re You.”

Jim Wallis, founder and editor of Sojourners magazine and best selling author, likes to tell people that it is easy to quickly recognize members of Congress.  “They’re the ones…who walk around town with their fingers held high in the air, having just licked them and put them up to see which way the wind is blowing.” 

            But “the great practitioners of real social change,” he argues, “…knew that you don’t change a society by merely replacing one wet-fingered politician with another.  You change a society by changing the wind.”[1]

“Changing the wind.”  “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”  If all that feels a little intimidating, let me suggest that such a thought is in fact “good news” rather than “bad.”  There really are very few things more paralyzing, more demoralizing than a sense of helplessness, dogged determinism, and impotence.  To claim a seat at the table of formative opportunity is to assert that we are more than baggage in the cargo hold of a plane, but rather voices who help determine where the plane is headed. 

            As we have been acknowledging these last few weeks, we are not the only voices, and sometimes not the most welcomed ones.   Giving extended and serious thought to this intersection of faith and public life, we began this series with the Apostle Paul who talked about the value that authorities contribute as instruments of order, intended by God to provide and protect the public space for our common thriving, deserving our respect.  But then looking over Moses’ shoulder as he confronted the Egyptian Pharaoh, we also acknowledged that whenever those authorities neglect that holy purpose, it is the obligation of good and faithful people to oppose them.   And last week we recognized that American public life, as our founders framed it, is designed to welcome the voices of faithful people, but not defer to one or another them in particular, or the aggregate of them in general.   If our convictions are to prevail, as people of faith, it must necessarily be because those convictions have proven persuasive, not because we have proven coercive.

            But speak up we must, for every other voice that seeks a hearing in the marketplace of ideas and values has a more parochial agenda.  Think of the arguments proffered in every significant debate of our day:  financial profit has its spokespeople; physical or political security certainly has its advocates; ego and pride never seem to have a shortage of voices, nor do expediency or comfort or pleasure.  But meaning?  Goodness?  Intentional stewardship?  Mutual well-being? 

Plenty will argue that one course or another will make us money, will keep us safe, or will make us comfortable; but who is asking questions deeper or more far reaching – about purpose and fulfillment; about becoming our “best selves” as a people?  If the “good” is about more than comfort or profit or merely being safe, what, then, are we trying to achieve?  Where are we trying to go?

            One of the wisdom speakers in the Hebrew Scriptures put his finger on the heart of it just this succinctly:  “where there is no vision, the people perish.”  Or, as more modern translations have rendered it, “Where there is no prophecy,” which is simply another way of saying “where there is no sense of God’s creative desire,” then “the people cast off restraint.”  They fire off, in other words, in every direction, like bumper cars at the Fair, doing whatever seems expedient and satisfying at the time, without concern for their larger implications.  Without some larger sense of purposeful well-being, the whole fabric eventually comes unraveled. 

Which, to finally say it quite bluntly, but I don’t believe excessively:  our world depends on the active and vocal contribution of those devoted to seeing life from a larger view; indeed, the well-being of our life together hangs in the balance.  We do not control that conversation, but we have a contribution to make as part of it:  asking questions and asserting values larger and ultimately more significant than the security of borders and the consumer price index. 

So what will it mean for us to help change the wind?  What will it sound like for us to speak up in ways that prevent the triumph of evil?  Sometime in the 8th century B.C.E., a prophet by the name of Amos insisted that children of God:

Seek good and not evil,
Hate evil and love good,
   and establish justice in the gate 
(Amos 5:14-15)

            To be sure, those imperatives contain abstractions, the details of which leave room for debate.  William Sloan Coffin, the late preacher at Riverside Church in New York City, once mused that Amos was right on target when he said “let justice roll down like mighty waters, but figuring out the irrigation system is complicated.” [2]

But Christians aren’t bereft of insight into at least the rudimentaries of that vision.  Day after day, Jesus modeled the importance and practice of translating holy ideas into common practice:  taking the time to listen to and hear a stranger; interrupting his progress to touch the ill in healing ways; overturning the tables of systems grown distorted and contrary to their helpful intent; remembering out loud that “it’s not all about us” – it wasn’t even “all about him.”  Justice, compassion, welcome, forgiving grace. 

Y     Co-creation rather than joint control;

Y     concern for the “least of these,” instead of envy for those with the “most of all that”;

Y     esteem for those with the widest heart instead of those with the tightest grip;

Y     mutual responsibility rather than survival of the strongest;

Y     concern for the goose and not just hungry lust for its golden egg;

Y     destiny – the way the world ought to be – more than merely history – the way we have always done it;

Y     deep and humbling gratitude for all we have, rather than insatiable craving for all there is to want.

            “…to change the wind, you have to know what direction you want it to move in,” Jim Wallis concludes, “and that is about vision.” [3]

                        …without which we perish. 

We have the opportunity not simply to respect the powers and to keep them separate; but perhaps the critical, concluding word for us to hear is that we have, as well, the opportunity to help mold them:  in caucuses coming up; in forums with candidates who come near; through organizations like our own AMOS group that will convene a major issues forum on Saturday, October 27 at Plymouth Church to try and immerse ourselves in the matters at hand with an eye for what lies beyond. 

We have a vision to share.  As people of faith, we have a word to speak about the kind of life that sustains life.  But all that is necessary for that life to crumble and fall into disarray is that good people keep their vision to themselves.   What are the fingerprints you will be leaving on this life we hold in common?  What effect will you have on the prevailing winds that blow? 

Another prophet put it this way: 

Write the vision;
   make it plain on tablets,
   so that a runner may read it.
[4]

Write it, speak it, or email it to your representatives, but whatever you do, don’t keep it to yourself.  You can help “mold the powers.” 

 



[1] Jim Wallis, God’s Politics (San Francisco:  HarperCollins, 2006) pp. 21-22.

[2] Bill Moyers Interviews William Sloane Coffin on NOW. 3.05.04, http://www.pbs.org/moyers/faithandreason/print/coffin_print.html

[3] Ibid p. 24.

[4] Habakkuk 2:2