November 6, 2005 Des Moines

TEXT:  Joshua 3:7-17

 

The Gospel in the Present Tense

As the great sage Yogi Berra once said, “It’s ‘déjà vu’ all over again.”  We’ve heard this story before, haven’t we?  In a way.  Any patient reader who began at the trailhead of Israel’s saga of escape from Egyptian slavery and stayed with it through Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, will certainly hear in this story a song with a familiar tune:  a traveling people, a barrier river, and a miraculous crossing.  The names have changed – of everything, including the river – but the basic plot line looks like a fairly transparent sequel, the likes of which Hollywood is always dishing up.  And for the record, those who have already read ahead will know that this isn’t the last river parting we’ll ever see.  By the time the Hebrew Scriptures have come to their narrative semi-colon, these poor Middle Eastern rivers will almost be cowering and retreating at the mere sight of approaching Israelites.

Almost.  These watercourse contortions are not just parlor tricks for the kids, nor theme-park re-creations for the vicarious thrill of the guests.  However much genuine assistance they may have provided the people, at their core they were dramatic confirmations.  The humbling, disconcerting truth seems to be that the lessons of history have very little traction.  It appears that we have to keep learning them again and again.  And so it’s never finally enough to know that God has been active in the past.  The implicit question every generation finally gets down to hurling heavenward is “What have you done for me lately?”  As impressive as the “mighty acts of God” may appear to us as we read about them in the lives of our forbears, we don’t manage to find them sufficiently compelling to plant on them our own frail feet. 

Hence, this freshly intimidating river.  OK, maybe “intimidating” is a slight exaggeration.  OK, maybe it is even a gross exaggeration.  The Jordan River has been a lot of things as it has snaked its way not only through this arid landscape but also biblical history.  It has been border, baptistery, metaphorical threshold of heaven.  But rarely has it been a barrier.  Often more ditch than river, it is “readily fordable at several points and the first bridge was constructed only after the Arab invasion in the seventh century A.D.”[1]

The narrator ratchets up the tension by ominously noting that the crossing occurred at the time of the spring harvest, when the river is swollen by rains and the melting of mountain snows.  It’s true that Jordan’s waters can become more challenging with such runoff – even treacherous with its “sudden variations in depth, due to the crooked course of the channel, and to the swiftness of its flow,”[2] but these seasonal fluctuations were likelier to mean more discomfort than impediment. 

In the end – and quite apart from whatever hazards might have actually been presented by the seasonal runoff – the navigational barrier confronting the Israelites likely had more to do with what was gurgling inside than in front of them.  Indeed, the biblical lexicon of images frequently uses water as a kind of psychical shorthand.  The Hebrew imagination used water to paint evil, chaos, mystery.  In Creation, it was water that God needed to tame and push away in order to make room for the orderliness of dry land.  In the later story of sin and re-creation, order – dry land – is doused again by the chaotic floods.  Water carries with it ominous implications.  Stories of deliverance routinely involve rescue from the watery threat – Noah, the infant Moses from the river, the Israelites through the Red Sea, and now through the river again. 

The disciple Peter was terrified when his “lack of faith” caused him to start sinking into the water he was seeking to walk across, less because he feared drowning, I suspect, than he dreaded contact with the murky, mysterious terrors that slithered and groped beneath the surface.  Even baptism, in its way, continues the symbolic theme of rescue from water.  And is it any wonder that in John’s vision of the Holy City in the fullness of God’s reign recorded in the book of Revelation, he reports that “the sea was no more.”  Time after time, God parts the waters – clears safe passage through the murky chaos – of whatever threatens the faithful. 

All of which is easy to observe in retrospect; meanwhile, a river ominously rumbles across the Israelites path, and forward progress is stalled.  It is interesting that when Moses led the people across the river, the threat was approaching the Israelites from the rear – in the form of a chasing and rapidly approaching Egyptian army.  This time, the threat is confronting the people from ahead – primarily in the form of murky anxieties and apprehensions about what the watery future might have in store. 

Earlier, while Moses was still in charge, a reconnaissance team had brought back reports of the land’s abundance – grapes the size of bowling balls, and rivers flowing with mild and honey.  But they also mentioned the presence of giants who dominated the land.  Despite the fact that a more recent report from spies had asserted that the land was “given into their hands,” visions of those imposing giants no doubt haunted the people’s imagination – literal giants, perhaps, but certainly the giant undertaking of claiming, settling and familiarizing themselves with a dramatically new land and categorically different way of life.  After all this time of wandering, what would it mean to settle?  After all this time “on the way,” what would it mean to arrive?  After generations organized for portability, what would it mean to organize for stability?

A swollen river cut across the Israelites path, then, that both hindered and protected.  Hopeful, but fearful, anxious but apprehensive, intrigued but intimidated, the people camped.  From the safety of their tents and fires, they fretted and fidgeted; impatient, but ultimately paralyzed.

“Who can help us?  Who can save us?  Moses is dead.”  Where is the gospel in the present tense?  So it was that…

 “The LORD said to Joshua, ‘This day I will begin to exalt you in the sight of all Israel, so that they may know that I will be with you as I was with Moses.”

And a subtle, but significant phenomenon occurs.   Sure, the river parts and the people pass safely – and dryly – through.  Even a casual reader has come to expect no less.  It isn’t so much the “what” this time as the “who” and the “how.”  Despite the opening dialogue between God and Joshua, the story doesn’t finally spotlight one charismatic mover and shaker.  While the first water crossing featured Moses in the starring role – he hears, he leads, he steps forward, he stretches out his arms and holds them up at considerable muscular fatigue – in this story, Joshua plays a symbolic but less instrumental role.  He hears the initial command, but then passes it on.  He is neither the one who carries the Ark, nor the one who steps first into the water.  In fact, beyond the initial assurance, whatever subsequent role Joshua might have played in the miracle must have been behind the scenes.  We don’t hear his name again until the mission is accomplished.  Leadership has become more diffuse, and obedience – at least for the moment – more invested than compliant.  It wasn’t Moses after all, the people have a chance to discern, but the God who was working powerfully behind him – and now working behind, and in front of, them. 

            It was a faith the people would have to trust, not merely posit.  The story includes the fascinating detail that “when those who bore the ark had come to the Jordan, and the feet of the priests bearing the ark were dipped in the edge of the water, 16the waters flowing from above stood still…”  There was no luxury of standing and watching from a safe and shady distance while the way cleared before taking further steps forward.  The children of Israel actually had to step into the water before the water parted.  There was risk, not certainty.  No advance confirmation, the proving would be in the doing; themselves. 

Today we are pausing with the church universal to remember and give thanks.  Ostensibly, All Saints Day is set aside to recall those beloved individuals – both local and legendary – who uniquely and transparently bore witness to the living and moving God; those who helped animate our collective spiritual vitality in days now past.  We call their names, picture their faces, and inhale again the fresh breeze of their legacy.  But hopefully we’ll do more.  The power of All Saints Day is the graphic comprehension that God’s Spirit and purpose stir in the lives of the present tense.  As God was with Moses, so God is with Joshua.  As God was with the saints whose names are fresh on our lips, so God is with us.  If we forget or neglect that assurance, we become a museum, a mausoleum, rather than a missionary people living as a sign, foretaste and instrument of God’s reign; eviscerated by the memories, rather than invigorated.

So what rivers wash threateningly across the paths ahead of us, and have we any hope of crossing them?  We could start by remembering similar barriers past and how they were finally traversed.  But eventually any progress will require that we grip our fingers around the conviction that the movement and vision of God have as much to do with this moment as that remembered one, and faithfully, trustfully, be willing to get our feet wet. 

The “Promised Land,” after all, is waiting – on the other side.

 



[1] A. Graeme Auld, The Daily Study Bible, “Joshua, Judges and  Ruth” (Philadelphia:  Westminster Press, 1984) p. 23.

[2] James Howell, The Storyteller’s Companion to the Bible, “Exodus – Joshua”, edited by Michael E. Williams (Nashville:  Abingdon, 1992) p. 174.