| |
Previous
2002 Sermons
May
12, 2002
Text:
Psalm 68:1-10, 32-35
As
With A Mother’s Embrace
Just
about a year ago, best-selling horror and suspense writer Stephen King
gave the commencement address at Vassar College. His remarks, titled Scaring
You to Action, included this question:
"What
will you do? Well, I'll tell you one thing you're not going to do, and
that's take it with you. I'm worth I don't exactly know how many millions
of dollars--I'm still in the Third World compared to Bill Gates, but on
the whole I'm doing OK--and a couple of years ago I found out what "you
can't take it with you" means. I found out while I was lying in the ditch
at the side of a country road, covered with mud and blood and with the
tibia of my right leg poking out the side of my jeans like the branch
of a tree taken down in a thunderstorm. I had a MasterCard in my wallet,
but when you're lying in the ditch with broken glass in your hair, no
one accepts MasterCard.
We
all know that life is ephemeral, but on that particular day and in the
months that followed, I got a painful but extremely valuable look at life's
simple backstage truths. We come in naked and broke. We may be dressed
when we go out, but we're just as broke. Warren Buffett? Going to go out
broke. Bill Gates? Going to go out broke. Tom Hanks? Going out broke.
Steve King? Broke. Not a crying dime. And how long in between? How long
have you got to be in the chips? "I'm aware of the time passin' by, they
say in the end it's the blink of an eye." That's how long. Just the blink
of an eye.
Yet
for a short period—-let's say 40 years, but the merest blink in the larger
course of things—-you and your contemporaries will wield enormous power:
the power of the economy, the power of the hugest military-industrial
complex in the history of the world, the power of the American society
you will create in your own image. Of all the power which will shortly
come into your hands--gradually at first, but then with a speed that will
take your breath away--the greatest is undoubtedly the power of …"
King,
of course, didn’t stop there. He went on to fill in the blank, which became
the real focus of his speech. But I want to stop there to give us all
the space to consider what belongs there as "the greatest power"
in our lives, and who – or what – helps us figure it out. In the mid-19th
century, William Ross Wallace asserted that "the hand which rocks
the cradle is the hand that rules the world." I think he’s on to
something. Those who nurture us and form us – especially at an early age
– ultimately shape the character of the culture we live in; the kind of
world we inhabit.
So,
on this Mother’s Day, 2002 who is rocking the cradle? I don’t mean in
the literal sense – as if to turn this into some already tired attack
on working parents who farm out their children to be raised by others.
While the considerations I want to invite are ultimately local – to be
considered household by household, they are also congregational – and
ultimately cultural. The truth is that that formative cradle motion is
propelled by all kinds of forces. And it isn’t just confined to childhood.
Our cradles are rocked by influential forces throughout our lives – some
of which are obvious, like families and churches and schools, but many
of which we scarcely are aware.
Consider
a few simple statistics. Studies calculate that the average American child
will have spent between 19,000 and 24,000 hours in school if he or she
does not drop out before completing high school. That represents the equivalent
of between 2.1 and 2.7 full years of one’s life. By contrast, nearly thirteen
years of an average American’s life (75-year lifespan) will be spent watching
television – three full years of which will have been commercials (See
Budde… 65). According to one calculation, "more U.S. households have
televisions than have flush toilets" (ibid 66). And of course television
isn’t the only hand. There are newspapers, radios, billboards and computers.
It has been estimated that we "Americans are exposed to ads, logos,
brand identifiers, jingles, and other forms of corporate symbolic expressions
at the rate of sixteen thousand per day" (ibid).
So
whose hand is rocking the cradle?
But
one doesn’t need to statistics to get the point. Do a time and attention
audit of your own. Think about your week – and the weeks of your children.
Who has your ear – your time, and therefore your mind? How much time,
for example, is spent intentionally engaging and nourishing the development
of your faith? How much time is spent watching TV, listening to the radio,
surfing the web, reading billboards or newspaper ads; how much time is
spent reading or watching the news; how much time is spent thumbing through
catalogues?
Consider
this: If you spend three hours each week in Sunday school and worship,
that adds up to less than 1.5 years over the course of your lifetime.
Let’s say you augment that conscious attention to your faith by spending
30 minutes a day each of the other six days of the week in prayer or devotional
reading. You have upped your total to just over 2.5 years of intentional
faith development over the course of your life – comparable to the time
you will have invested in formal education, but still well-short of simply
the volume of commercials you will have watched.
Whose
hand is rocking the cradle? What messages are we hearing as we mature?
Whose stories are forming us – shaping our values, our ambitions, our
passions? People of faith have always recognized the critical importance
of formation, understanding that there are no second-generation Christians.
If the church is to survive, we have known, it will only be through the
living faith of each generation, nurtured and shaped by the one before
it.
As
Michael Budde and Robert Brimley point out in their recent startling book,
Christianity Incorporated, "There is nothing natural or innate
about being a Christian (or a Jew, or a surgeon, or a stamp collector).
Being a Christian is an identity that one acquires from others -–a set
of dispositions, affections, and practices that are learned from persons
already formed by the narratives, songs, and traditions of the faith (Budde…
75).
What,
then, are the stories that are playing the formative role in our culture
– with our kids and each other? Through what stories are we being shaped?
Are they the stories of Moses, of Joshua, of David, Elijah, David &
Esther; the stories of Mary and Elizabeth, Jesus and Paul. Or are they
the stories of Bill Gates, Ray Krock, Kenneth Lay, Ruppert Murdoch? They
aren’t the same; they bend us in different ways. Whose stories – which
stories – form us, and more importantly our children? For it is those
stories – hearing them, reflecting on them, testing out their implications
– that makes the impression. It isn’t simply memorizing dogmas or facts.
As Budde and Brimley go on to conclude, "The need is not simply for
knowledge about Christianity, but knowing how to think, feel, and desire
as someone formed by and fluent in the stories, symbols, and exemplars
of the Christian drama" (ibid 77)
What
are the stories, and who is telling them? It isn’t easy work – anytime,
but especially today – in the face of all the competition. If we are going
to exert some new attention toward this critical work, it will take strength
– to turn off the TV from time to time; to create intentional moments
for telling stories and being together in different ways; to say "no"
with more conviction and "yes" only when it’s right, not merely
when it’s easier. It will take deep conviction and – what may be the hardest
of all – it will take a willingness to take a less traveled road.
It
will take, in other words, a renewed investment in "mothering."
I’m not talking about "motherhood" – which is, essentially a
biological function that can be accomplished cavalierly, thoughtlessly,
and even by surrogates. I’m talking, rather, about the verb "mothering"
– a responsibility not restricted to females that connotes care, nurture,
protection, encouragement, and formation. We get all warm and gooey when
talking about the nurturing role of mothers – the tender caresses
and embraces of the soft-hearted mother; the unconditionally loving and
ever-forgiving "sponsor" who sees in her children no wrong.
But we too often neglect that other, equally critical task that is incumbent
on those who would deliver to the world healthy, responsible, individuated
offspring: the harder, more splintery fencework of formation.
It
is the kind of work that gardeners have learned to invest in their tomatoes,
but parents too often forget to invest in their kids. To be sure, tomatoes
have been growing forever – with or without human help, as perhaps can
be said about children. But who knows any more how long ago it was that
some farmer first discovered that tomato plants need an elevating frame.
Left to their tender and spindly selves – if simply nurtured with water
and sunlight and an occasional feeding – they bend and eventually lay
over onto the ground where they are easily trampled and their fruit easily
rots. But if they are guided – if some strengthening and shaping and lifting
form is used along with some simple tie-strings to hold them in place,
the plant grows erect and the tasty fruit flourishes in such numbers as
to supply the whole neighborhood. It would be easier to just let them
grow like they want – easier for the gardener and easier for the plant
– but the results are puny and sadly lacking. The encouragement of good
fruit – like the encouragement of good people – takes intentional and
guiding formation.
Those
are the kind of qualities I hear the Psalmist ascribe to God: compassionate
encourager, nurturer, strength and defender who responds boldly to enemies
– a designation that is left ambiguous enough to include "forces"
of any description, inside of us as well as around us, that work in opposition
to the purposes of God. It is, suggests the Psalmist, that kind of mothering
embrace that holds us both now and in eternity. Might it be that kind
of mothering embrace that all of us could stand to practice – one that
holds, lifts, and thoughtfully, carefully sees to the shape our children
in life and children in faith are taking?
|
 |
|